I liked John C. Bean’s “Using Rubrics to
Develop and Apply Grading Criteria.” I liked the position he took in his
article, and I liked his own personal technique as well. I feel like his technique
will possibly make more students satisfied especially since he embraces more
than one method of feedback. In addition, I liked how he pointed out some of the
same things the reader may be thinking while reading his article. For example
he says, “Although this process might seem time-consuming, I believe it leads
to fairer and more thoughtful grades because each paper receives a score from
both a holistic and an analytic perspective” (Bean 281). From reading his
article, I get the sense that Bean is great at what he does, is open minded,
and dedicated to students’ success. I am not sure if other teachers will be
willing to do everything he does.
Furthermore, I did not know there were
so many different rubrics. Actually, I do not recall any of my teachers using one
of the rubrics I really liked within the article. I like when a teacher writes
out how they feel about my paper or assignment, and that is why I embraced the “Analytic
Rubric with Non-Grid Design” (Bean 277). I also like to know exactly what a
teacher is looking for so I favored the “Task-Specific Rubric for a Genre” as
well (Bean 273). Moreover, Bean’s article made me think about a teacher I currently
have when he started talking about the dilemma with rubrics. Although I liked
some of the rubrics proposed, if I become a teacher in the future I am not sure
if I will use them. When I was younger, I believe giving me certain numbers did
affect me.
No comments:
Post a Comment